Clavicular sparks major backlash after claiming women with “15 bodies” are unable to truly form emotional bonds

Clavicular’s recent comments on love and intimacy, stemming from a podcast hypothetical, have ignited a massive online debate. Critics accuse him of biologizing relationships and making judgmental statements about women’s sexual history. While some defend his bluntness, others question the scientific validity of his claims, sparking widespread discussion on modern relationships and public figures’ influence.

Clavicular has never been shy about sharing strong opinions, but his latest comments have pushed him straight into the center of an online firestorm. A short clip from One Night with Steiny began circulating on social media late Tuesday, quickly racking up views and reactions. In it, Clavicular offers a blunt take on love, intimacy, and what he believes happens when sexual history crosses a certain line.The debate, presented as a hypothetical, resonated because of the manner in which it was presented. The clip circulated across the platforms within hours, with critics accusing Clavicular of making relationships biologized, and others praising him as saying what they think others are afraid to say. It was a short moment, however, and the reply was voluminous.

How Clavicular’s podcast answer ignited backlash

During the episode of One Night with Steiny, the host posed a scenario designed to test emotional boundaries. He asked, “Okay, so you have a 10 out of 10, great personality, but she has 15 bodies and she loves you. She wants to get married. She doesn’t love me.”Clavicular did not hesitate. He replied, “That’s the thing. If she’s got 15 bodies, she is unable to actually form a peer bond with you. A lot of the oxytocin response has been diminished with a sexual partner.”Critics soon objected to the scientific validity of the statement insisting that emotional attachment could not be quantified in only one hormone or in a number. Clavicular was accused by others of framing women using a judgmental approach and not paying due attention to more general emotional influences, such as trust, compatibility and shared values.

As the debate grew, Clavicular did not walk back his statement. Instead, the clip continued to circulate, drawing millions of impressions and sparking conversations far beyond the podcast’s usual audience.Whether seen as outdated thinking or uncomfortable honesty, the moment has cemented Clavicular as a polarizing voice. What began as a hypothetical question has turned into a wider argument about love, science, and how public figures frame modern relationships.Also Read: “An absolute psychopath”: Clavicular controversy intensifies as old dating app post goes viral